Membership

Are you well diversified? Is your savings all in USD or spread across multiple types of assets, but still based in USD? If it is, you are still not what we consider ultimately hedged, as in hedged into other nations currencies which are backed by their allocations, production, resources and politics. We believe the best way to be hedged to to be spread across the 8 most respected western currencies. Those being the Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Swiss franc, Euro dollar, Great British pound, Japanese yen, New Zealand dollar and United States dollar. Rotating among these with a slight edge producing a gain above equilibrium.

This strategy uses the same free floating cash approach as all large banks, but with the tactical advantage of intermittent currency exposure utilizing a probable edge.

Think of this system as exactly the same as holding cash in a bank account, but with the ability to use leverage, letting trades sit until hitting either a Target, Stop or direction reversed. This strategy is extremely diversified and as such, is not subject to over weighted moves due to all your cash being held in a single currency bank account.

The goal of the system is to minimize the volatility associated with a traditional cash bank account. Substituting single currency volatility and buying power decay, with account stability and growth.

There is no obligation and you can cancel the program at anytime.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Don't Burst my Bubble



“There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion.  The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as the final and total catastrophe of the currency involved.”  ~ Ludwig Von Mises

The United States is now based on debt; this perpetual debt has come from the promotion of wealth and financial security.  Some may say that consumers and borrowers were coaxed into the borrowing to expand growth in our economy by spending.  We saw the outcome of debt and mass loans can do in 2008.  In 1999 through 2005, the housing market was up trending and the federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) wanted to make buying a home more accessible to everyone.  In 1977, The Community Reinvestment Act gave strong incentives to lenders who would loan money to low-income borrowers expanding the role of bankers to loan sales men.  In 1980, the Monetary Control Act Deregulation made it so lenders could change the interest rate depending on the borrower's credit score, the lower the score the higher the rate, unfortunately a low score is a sign of debt or non-consistent income. In 1982, The Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act gave way to balloon payments making a final payment much higher than original payments and Variable Interest Rates Loans, a loan that fluctuates over time.  Then in 1986, The Tax Reform Act that lowered the top tax rate and raised the bottom, it was the first time in income tax history and gave back substantially if you bought a home.  All of these Acts were to entice home buyers who could not truly afford a home.
 This gave way to a real problem called Sub-prime lending.  In 1999, the sub-prime loan mortgage market exploded and anyone with bad credit, no credit, low income, no income could get a loan.  Sub-prime loans are primarily used to finance mortgages that Prime loan qualifications cannot meet.  This added nine million people to the ranks of home ownership, more than half were minorities.  The people were uneducated about the loans and the consequences that could take place.  The sub-prime loans offered are expensive and have major penalties and higher interest rates that can make the payments overwhelming as the rate increases.  The people knew little about the mechanism of a sub-prime loan, and eagerly singed papers to fulfill their dream of home ownership.  The worst mortgages were offered to the least qualified, Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs) like interest only or payment option ARMs would reset after one to two years, then change weekly or monthly. As the increase in borrowers flooded the market, the home equity was rising and the borrower would sell or refinance before the rates would adjust, at least that is what the banks would convince you of while you were signing. They knew what they were doing.
The Federal Reserve lowered the Federal funds rate 11 times, from 6.5% in May 2000 to 1.75% in December 2001. This created a flood of liquidity and growth in the economy and other lending markets. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) relaxed the net capital that freed them to leverage up to 30, even 40 times their initial investment in 2004.  Goldman Sachs (GS) The Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch (MER), and Morgan Stanley (MS) all acquired new lenders; including Sub-prime, lenders securing trillions of dollars in mortgage backed securities and saw bigger profits than expected for years.  In return the stocks kept rising.  The FED began raising its rates up to 5.25 percent.
As people became aware of the downfalls the loans held, the horror stories were airing on every headline creating panic and people stopped buying and started defaulting on their loans.  The lenders of the sub-prime loans were filing for bankruptcy weekly, in February of 2007 over twenty-five companies filed for bankruptcy.  The news spread like a wildfire.  The degree of leverage by the large companies could no longer be supported and they “broke the buck” by creating capital risk with leverage.  Many investment firms were unable to cover the credit derivative contracts.  They halted the sales of short sells trying to stabilize the market, but it was too late.  The panic and uncertainty spread in to the interbank market and they needed to prevent it from becoming a global catastrophe.  The government then had to issue bailout programs with help from the European Union and Japan and other central banks came together using conventional and unconventional methods to provide liquidity support to the institutions.  The Fed cut rates along with the CB, Sweden, China, Canada, Switzerland, and The European Central Bank.  It was not enough.  Each with their own versions of bailout packages, outright nationalization government guarantees, and finally The U.S. came out with The National Economic Stabilization Act buying up billions of distressed assets.
We still have seen the effects of the bubble that burst in the mortgage market; the market has not fully recovered and may never.  Economic cycles that are manipulated though the monetary expansion, this debt can create a large bubble, much larger than the natural cycle would hold.  With that, larger bubble will come much larger consequences; right now, the magnitude of this bubble we are facing in 2015 is bigger than it’s ever been in history.  Since 2008, the Central banks (CB) and Federal Reserve (FED) removed collateral from the markets that were high quality.  The American people and government are even more leveraged out against even smaller quality assets paying a much higher price than they ever were in 2007. The Wall Street Journal came out with an estimate that states “a third of traders have never or will witness a rate hike” this era has driving a rise in leverage.  Chain reaction leading to the collapse has been set in motion for some time now.
The U.S. Treasuries has a rate of return that is considered “risk free” rate of return that is the assets that all assets are priced based on riskiness.  The rate has been falling for over twenty-five years.  These falling rates then spread to other rates of return making investors barrow or turn to leverage to gain a higher return.  While the past thirty years, we have seen investing risk getting cheaper because the bull market those bonds have been in.  This time it will be much different the crash will be all assets worldwide and it will happen simultaneously to devastate huge segments of the global population.  The Fed can keep printing money until they own all the publicly traded companies and we all end up working for the FED or government.  The powers that be like the major investment institutes, CB the FED whose actions have perpetuated and continue to exacerbate the bubble, know just what the outcome of their actions and decisions will be.  The European Central Bank, The World bank along with The International Monetary Fund (IMF) all understand and have understood just what this next massive credit bubble and most large corporations wont be hurt by the outcome.  They know they have laid the groundwork for it and in some way, they will profit from it in the end.  The bubble will only hurt the public and again their personal savings accounts will be drained in the bailout funded by hard working middle class, until they have, nothing left to contribute it will be for the good of the nation, of course.